False Victimization Syndrome (FVS) is a generalized term applied to all individuals who are believed to be reporting false situations of stalking, and presenting themselves as victims (Mullen, et, 2009). Previous research has suggested this to be a relatively rare occurrence, with police reports finding 2%, however, more recent research has suggested as many as 11.5% in self-reported community samples may present (Mullen, et al., 2009) However, it is important to distinguish between the types of FVS, not all presentations are attention-seeking, or in search of monetary gain, some are suffering from genuine mental health conditions and require treatment. Given the increasing attention on stalking, researchers believe there are more opportunities for FVS presentation, and it is important to keep records as well as learn to distinguish the signs and typologies, given limited resources for stalking victims, both within the CJS as well as mental/health services (Mullen, et al., 2009). It should be recognized, though, a proportion of FVS reports may require legitimate mental health treatment.
Research finds that those with FVS are not different from the general population, regarding demographics. However, researchers did find victims were more likely to be in relationships (Mullen, et al., 2009).
Those identified as FVS were not more likely to contact law-enforcement or involve their families. However, those with FVS were more likely to be involved in some form of legal action. They were more likely to contact a lawyer, or seek unsolicited medical advice (Mullen, et al.., 2009).
Research found FVS group was more likely to report following and surveillance, however, they were less likely to report secondary-victim involvement (Mullen, et al., 2009).
The FVS groups also suffered significantly more mental health effect, (61% v. 24%) reported suicidal ideation. Additionally a "high proportion [of FVS] them are delusional" and acknowledge self-harm (Mullen, et al., 2009).
This is believed to be the largest group, with severe mental illnesses suffering from persecutory or erotomanic delusions. While we commonly think of them stalking their target, some will believe their obsession is pursuing them, known as incubus syndrome, a variant of erotomania (Mullen, et al., 2009). They may believe they are being stalked by more than one person, or a "network." Growing awareness of stalking may provide additional fodder for this.
Victims of stalking can develop a host of mental health concerns including hypervigilance and hypersensitivity, thus subsequently develop FVS, due to the level of anxiety and isolation that comes from the initial victimization (Mullen, et al., 2009). Innocuous situations are misinterpreted. Victims who were dismissed or minimized by those in their circle, CJS, or mental/health professionals may be at higher risk for this. This should not be confused with serial victimization, or an unknown victim typology.
This occurs when the stalker claims to be the victim, this can occur in a number of contexts, and while often identified as intentionally manipulative, additional pathologies have been identified (Mullen, et al., 2009). There is evidence suggesteing that some stalkers may attribute blame to the victim, as a "defense mechanism." There is also an occurrence called "fusion," this is when the stalker blends their personality with that of their victim, in a "union" (Mullen, et al., 2009, p. 215).
Fictitious victims seek gratification or dependency needs through adopting victim status. In addition to claiming victimhood, they usually feign psychological symptoms, possibly physical "symptoms" to support their allegations. This category includes those who were victimized, and subsequently identifying as a victim serves to validate their identity (Mullen, et al., 2009). This should not be confused with malingering, although these individuals may acquire secondary motivations such as financial reward, this is not the primary motivation.
Malingering is the conscious fabrication or exaggeration of claims of victimizations for clear external incentives, such as financial reward (Mullen, et al., 2009). This, however, is rare, it is likely to co-occur with another type of mental health problem, or it is being mislabeled due to an unrecognized true stalking-victimization that is occurring.
Copyright © 2024 Just Stalking - All Rights Reserved.
Just Stalking: Resources, Inc. is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization (EIN: 93-4264447).
Disclaimer: We are NOT a legal, mental health, medical, victims' advocate provider(s). We are NOT certified educators, financial experts, security specialists, or self-defense experts. While some of our staff may have training, background, or experience in legal, mental health, medical, victims' advocacy, education, financial, security, or self-defense fields pertaining to Maryland, none of our staff is currently, licensed, or certified specialists in the aforementioned fields. WE ARE NOT PROVIDING ADVICE, IN SUCH FIELDS. OUR GOAL IS TO DIRECT VICTIMS TO APPLICABLE PROVIDERS, PROVIDE FEEDBACK BASED ON PERSONAL EXPERIENCES, USING RELEVANT EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH & PRACTICES. WE WILL DO OUR BEST TO PROVIDE RESOURCES FOR ALL AFOREMENTIONED TIPS. IF YOU ARE IN DISTRESS PLEASE CALL 911.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.